Home Blog Page 75

Should Japan Ban Robot Romance?

0

By Reno J. Tibke

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — Leading researchers and organizations around the world are beginning to seriously consider the possibility, if not the inevitability, of emergent romance between humans and humanlike constructs, particularly those imbued with some level of non-biological intelligence.

The biennial International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) conference, scheduled for September 7-9 in Manchester, United Kingdom, is officially themed Technology and Intimacy: Choice or Coercion. In a sober and serious manner, the gathering aims to address possibilities and concerns surrounding both physical and virtual intimacy between humans and the machines and minds we’re creating.

To be clear, this is no fringe group–the IFIP was originally founded under the auspices of the United Nations and is comprised of highly regarded organizations and individuals from around the world (including Japan), all of whom work in or conduct research on information and communications technology (ICT). That this group recognizes a very real convergence across many disparate technologies, all pointing to real and distinct possibility, is a sign that we’ve hit a tipping point.

The practical and theoretical issues to be addressed at this conference are obviously universal across all human civilization, but there is a particular relevance for Japan. Specifically, it brings up the so-called “Aging Society Problem,” a phenomenon exacerbated by what recent surveys reveal to be a steadily growing ambivalence toward the institution of marriage, the prospect of having children, and in extreme cases, an abject indifference toward intimate human relationships of any kind. The logic is plain and simple: emotionally capable machines and/or software are coming soon, but large numbers of young Japanese people developing romantic relationships with them would only compound a persistent and arguably unstoppable demographic emergency.

There is an irony at work here: while the development, implementation, and export of industrial and assistive robotics are considered profoundly important to Japan’s future economy, emotional machines have the potential to further shrink Japan’s already unsustainable fertility rate (1.4 children/woman), thereby contributing to economic decline. What then do we do?

Well, it would be silly and impossible to ban robot romance. So, just as we put a great deal of thought into what further robotization will do to our manufacturing economies, we citizens should also start thinking about how machines and software will affect our love lives, and plan accordingly!

Review: Casio Smart Outdoor Watch WSD-F10

1

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — When it comes to standard digital watches, Casio stands out above all others in features, reliability, and accuracy. From their cheapest plastic tickers to their GPS-connected, solar-powered, apocalypse-proof metal masterworks, Casio generally makes the best, most usable, and most durable timepieces in every segment of the market they enter.

So when they announced their new WSD-F10 Android Wear-powered Smart Outdoor Watch, everyone, including smartwatch skeptics (me) wondered if this could be the one we’ve been waiting for – the one that would finally take the smartwatch concept and make it more than a niche toy for gadget loving geeks. Well…

One should never judge any piece of technology on looks alone, but as Apple has proved many times over, monkeys like shiny things. So, it’s good that the WSD-F10 Smart Outdoor Watch is a stunner. It lacks the gaudy metals that the fashionistas in Omotesando might be drawn to, instead sticking to the tried and tested, action/outdoors image that Casio is known for. It is, however, refined enough to handle peeking out from under a suit cuff far better than its G-Shock cousins.

Casio has included all their most famous watch faces as well as a few new ones designed specifically for the WSD-F10; being an Android Wear device, you could also use any other face you want. The bezel is nicely chunky, protecting the screen from occasional knocks; it houses three buttons, the barometric sensor, and a charging port. The watch also features an altimeter, compass, accelerometer, and gyrometer.

You can choose your WSD-F10 in one of four bezel colors: black, orange, maroon, and olive green. The colors are subtly metallic and the bezels are made from quality plastics.

The strap is a soft black rubber. Even on my peculiarly shaped wrists, the WSD-F10 was a comfortable fit, and, despite its considerable size, it disappeared after a few minutes – to the point where my first vibrating notification alert took me by surprise. Basically, it’s a proper Casio watch that happens to be able to connect to an Android phone.

The Casio DNA runs deep. While it is an Android Wear device and as such can do all the Googley things that every other Android smartwatch on the market can, the Casio extras set the WSD-F10 apart. It runs proprietary tool apps based around the watch’s built in sensors, there’s a compass, which, when coupled with the vibrant color display, is surprisingly useful – quite a bit more so than even some off Casio’s own Pro Trek watches.

The altimeter also works well and the tool tracks your altitude on a cool-looking graph, and since it also tracks negative values it makes travelling the Tokyo subway system quite interesting. The barometric info tool is clearly marked and is a great help when you see the clouds but aren’t sure how imminent the rain is.

The step and distance counter pairs with your phone and can track your activity both on the watch and on the Google Fit app or any other activity/workout monitor apps with Android Wear connectivity. It also provides sunrise/sunset times as well as a tide graph when connected to an Android device.

Casio has also enabled bluetooth pairing with their latest outdoor action camera, the Exilim EX-FR100 Outdoor Recorder.

Running all these sensors and all the other smartwatch bits and bobs does take a toll on the battery, though it easily gets through a full day of regular use. This is helped in part by a second, layered monochrome display that provides basic chronograph information without needing to turn on the full-color display (it of course becomes transparent when you use the watch’s full functionality). This feature is important – because telling the time should never take longer than it does for a standard dial or digital watch.

Casio’s only big omission with the Smart Outdoor Watch is built-in GPS. In an area with a mobile signal, this isn’t much of a problem, but the feature would be quite useful out in the wilderness where Casio is clearly hoping people will use this device (might have to wait for better battery technology).

Pairing went as usual for an Android Wear device in 2016; provided that all your software is up-to-date, there will be no problem getting up and running. As a Casio device, it performs as expected, looks good, and the data displays are well designed. The proprietary Casio tools are not only a nice addition, but I found myself using them far more often than I have on other Casio watches with the same features – just because the display looks so good. Even while running around the streets and subways of Tokyo, I got so used to using them for little things that when I finally had to return WSD-F10 to Casio, it genuinely took some readjusting to go back to not having that info at a glance.

When using the watch with Casio’s answer to the action cam, the EX-FR100 Outdoor Recorder, pairing was a bit of an interesting process that reminded me of an old Mortal Kombat fatality routine, but I got them tethered eventually. The watch doesn’t offer complete control of the camera, but you can see what you’re shooting on the display and you can take photos, shoot videos, and review your images. All of the camera’s specialized, unique features still require its own control module (but still… a watch-controlled camera is awesome). I would have liked to see at least the interval shooting options on the watch because it would make a great way to set and forget the camera while on the move.

As an aside, we should point out that that the Smart Outdoor Watch doesn’t pair with Casio’s other cameras like the EX-TR70, EX-100, and EX-ZR3600, which of course do not have detachable remote control units… so it would be nice if the watch could connect.

It wasn’t all smooth, but most of the bumps were courtesy of the operating system. Android Wear works on the WSD-F10 as with any other Android smartwatch, which means it requires considerable customization to precisely suit your needs. In the short time I had to review the device, I found myself spending so much time fine-tuning settings that it was getting in the way of life more than streamlining it. Also, voice control is hit and miss if you don’t speak standard American English (other languages were not tested), and I don’t care how cool Inspector Gadget was when you were a kid, talking into your watch looks and feels pretty silly. It’s also rude to speak into your devices on public transport in Japan, which is how one travels most of the time in Tokyo.

Personally, I found that no matter how I silenced the apps, notifications (usually social ones) continued bugging me even after being dismissed – I couldn’t escape the constant electronic nag on my wrist. I’m sure some more time and thorough customization would solve the problem, but I don’t like my mobile devices to require as much setup as a desktop gaming rig.

Subjectively, I think it’s the best looking watch (smart or dumb) Casio has made, and its large, vivid LCD screen makes using the watch’s built-in sensors much easier than on traditional models. It’s well made and withstands daily life far better than just about every other smartwatch on the market. And it’s a Casio, so it’s got the backing and heritage of the best digital watch company on the planet.

The Smart Outdoor Watch performs its Android Wear duties as well as any other device on the market, and for Android users looking at getting into wearables, this would be an excellent choice. iOS users, on the other hand, have far less functionality through the Android Wear app, and at the ¥70,000 asking price, it’s a much less exciting proposition – particularly since half of Casio’s proprietary tools (the big standout features) and pairing with the EX-FR100 action cam inexplicably require an Android phone. As a result, while Casio is more competent than the rest of the smartwatch field, ironically it’s the “smart” features that prevent the WSD-F10 from truly bringing smartwatches out of their niche geeky gadget status. For now.

In a big way, it seems like Android Wear is what’s holding this watch back. Personally, I’d like to see Casio release a non-Android version of the WSD-F10, fit it with GPS and a heart rate monitor, add the ability to connect to their other cameras, and like any fitness wearable, and if the user is so inclined, allow it to pair with all smartphones regardless of OS. Sure, untethering from a phone would lose most of the 1970s super-spy-watch-talking, and the annoying notifications, but it could truly be the best digital watch Casio has ever made, and it would appeal to more than just Android users.

(Review by Nayalan Moodley)

Grilled Salmon-Flavored Candy

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — A Japanese candy company, UHA Mikakuto, has released Shiojake (salt-grilled salmon) flavored gummy candy. The product name is Puccho Shiojake.

It’s a collaboration product between their Puccho candy and Kirimi-chan, a salmon fillet-shaped Sanrio character. Indeed, welcome to Japan.

There are salmon flakes in the center of the candy – UHA Mikakuto pursue real salmon flavor fearlessly. It’s a super fishy candy so you might want to eat it with rice.

It is available for a limited time. Probably very limited.

Review: Panasonic GH4 Video

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — Until the magical Canon 5D Mark II, the video camera world felt like it was going nowhere. But then BOOM!, thousands of people around the world now had, thanks to Canon, the chance to own a powerful Full HD compact video camera with the flexibility of both interchangeable lenses and memory card recording. Bye-bye expensive shoulder mounted camera, and bye-bye tapes!

While Canon was the real “king” with its full-frame 5D MKII, Panasonic quickly jumped into the market and launched the Lumix GH1, its first pro-oriented Micro Four Thirds camera, and a true challenger to the more expensive full-frame camera from Canon.

Granted, the GH1 was not as good in low light that the 5D MKII, but in good sunny conditions, the GH1 was a stunning little beast.

Almost six years has passed now, and while Panasonic and Canon have respectively improved their offerings, at this point, Panasonic is by far the real winner with the GH4!

Sharp and beautiful video is what makes the GH4 a killer

What makes the GH4 an amazing camera is the capacity to shoot 4K videos at 100Mbit/s 30fps in an ultra-compact product. To be honest, at first I was a bit skeptical and I completely skipped the GH4 for its more affordable competitor, the Sony AX100. And to be fair, the Sony AX100 is a GREAT video camera, and its latest firmware update made it even better since the camera is now capable of shooting 4K 30fps video at 100Mbit/s instead of the previous 60Mbit/s. It’s fast, easy to use, has great image stabilization, and I would recommend the AX100 to ANYONE who wants to take great 4K videos on the spot.

However, even though the AX100 is a great camera, the Panasonic GH4 offers far better performance, but it comes at a certain cost that may discourage many casual shooters.

First, before wowing with the amazing things about the GH4, let’s talk about the downsides:

The GH4 AF (autofocus) sucks. Sony’s AX100 is way better and faster when tracking objects. The only way I found to get it work correctly is to use the AF Tracking mode and select the moving object you want to track.

The GH4 crashes, and crashes OFTEN! I have experienced this on the GH1, GH2, GH3, and now on the GH4… for some unknown reason, the GH4 may from time to time freeze or will tell you that it cannot record video correctly on the card forcing you to either wait a few seconds before being able to shoot again, or forcing you to remove the battery and reboot the camera.

Forget about IS (image stabilization) when recording videos – use a tripod!

Like the GH1, GH2, and GH3, the GH4 sucks like hell in low light! DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT go above ISO800. Everything above ISO800 will be filled with noise.

The internal microphone is bad and not well placed. If you hold the camera close to you, the mic will only record your breath, not the surrounding noise.

It needs SUPER-FAST and expensive SDXC cards. Any card below 60MB/s recording capacity will crash your camera.

The Rec button is too small and not easy to push, especially when you are wearing gloves, even thin ones.
Average Full HD Video capability. Yep, even at 200Mbit/s, the GH4 Full HD mode is just average… but who cares when you can shoot in 4K! (will explain this later)

Now what about the good, sorry, the GREAT things about the GH4 that made me sell my Sony AX100?

First and foremost, the GH4 has AMAZING 4K video quality and colors that are even better than the Sony AX100. The GH4 offers stunningly sharp videos, which some have complained are too sharp! Seriously guys? Too Sharp? This is freaking 4K here not SD!

When shooting with the AX100, I often had to slightly color correct each shot as well as tweak the overall contrast, which was really time consuming, especially if you are not a professional colorist. With the GH4, however, I rarely color correct my videos, unless I completely screwed something up or forgot about setting the correct white balance.

In that regard, Panasonic made the extra effort to offer nine different video modes to choose from when recording, giving you more flexibility on what you want to shoot. However, you will quickly realize that CineD (perfect for low light) and CineV (perfect for everything except low light) are effectively the only two modes you will ever need.

Another aspect that made me jump on the GH4 like a fly on a pot of honey was the possibility to change lenses. While Panasonic’s lineup is not yet as cool as Canon’s or Nikon’s, they and other manufacturers offer a decent number of lenses to choose from.

Of course, for those who are more adventurous than myself and do not mind losing your camera’s AF function, there are several lens adapters that will let you use Canon or Nikon’s wonderful lenses on your GH4.

The GH4 shines in other many aspects, too. For example, Panasonic made sure to weatherproof the camera, and when mounted with one of the two Lumix G X Vario lenses mentioned above, within limits, you will be able to shoot gorgeous video in dusty, rainy, or snowy places without fear. Another great, yet simple feature that the GH4 has but is sadly missing on the AX100 is the artificial horizon – it’ll help you to level your camera in any condition.

Finally, and before we jump into the last part of this review (why 4K matters), I would strongly advise you to get Panasonic’s Lumix DMW-WS2 external mic if you want to record some good quality audio for your videos. What I like about this mic is, unlike the previous model sold for the GH1, is that it does not require any additional batteries – the GH4 will power the mic and you will no longer risk any lost of sound if you tend to neglect this part of your microphone!

As you can see, I am really amazed by the GH4, despite its limitations, which are in my case the lousy AF, poor IS, and limited ISO. Now, as far as I am concerned, and for the kind of videos I am taking, I am able to overcome these limitations and adapt my shooting style accordingly, and good lord I am happy with the results!

So why does 4K matter? Granted, there are not many affordable 4K TVs or monitors available on the market yet. Shooting and editing in 4K require a very powerful computer, a speedy SSD, and an insane amount of storage for your rush. So, why move to 4K and get a GH4? Well, first of all, unlike 3D, 4K is not going to fade away: in the next five years 4K will be everywhere. Everything you are recording today in HD will feel blurry and outdated in the next two to three years. Sure, by then we will have better 4K cameras, but at least everything you shoot today in 4K will still look good in five years!

Second, shooting in 4K in an HD world allows you way more flexibility! You can actually blow (zoom), crop, and rotate a 4K image in an HD (1080p) workflow without ANY loss in quality and still have access to 4K rush in the future – this, my friends, is a HUGE advantage of 4K over HD.

Another thing to take into consideration with the GH4 is, as I mentioned earlier, its only “average” 200Mbit/s Full HD mode. Indeed, for a reason that I do not understand, shooting video in 4K at 100Mbit/s and converting to HD will result in better and sharper video than if you were recording in native HD 200Mbit/s with the GH4. I am sure that there is a good explanation for this, but for the time being stick to 4K even if you will export in HD.

Okay, now before you get too excited, I would like to re-stress an important fact: editing in 4K requires a powerful high-end PC, so before you go and buy any 4K Camera, get ready to spend a lot of money on additional hardware.

One more major thing to consider when shooting in 4K is image stabilization. Just like when we jumped from SD to HD we realized that a tiny little vibration on the tripod will result in jerky images, in 4K things are even worse. If you shoot in 4K to edit in a HD workflow, then no worries – your NLE IS plugin will fix it for you at no quality loss. But, if you stick with 4K, invest in a GOOD Manfrotto tripod.

Bottom line: The GH4 is an amazing camera, not perfect, but once you know how to work with its limitations, it will give you great, sharp 4K videos. If you can’t live with the GH4 limitations and need a good IS and AF, then go for the Sony AX100. Can’t afford a GH4 or AX100 but still want to shoot in 4K? Guess what: Panasonic has what you need with their very powerful DMC-FZ1000. Granted, the FZ1000 comes with a cheap look and feel, but it delivers very good 4K images!

So, now it’s time to pick one of the above cameras and shoot at will!

(Reviewed by Gonzague Gay-Bouchery)

Licking Pikachu in Shibuya

0

By Phoebe Amoroso

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — If you have ever wanted to a lick a Pikachu, I can confirm that he/she/ [insert your preferred gender here] tastes of mango. Yes, that’s right. If your childhood dreams of catching them all actually involved eating them all, you now can. Except, by all Pokémon, I actually mean mainly Pikachu.

Pokémon, which still retains huge popularity in Japan, has currently invaded The Guest Cafe and Diner on the seventh floor of Parco department store, Shibuya, Tokyo.

Promoting the re-release of Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire for the Nintendo 3DS in November, the walls of the cafe are bedecked with two color-coordinated Pikachu, who appear overjoyed with their cafe experience, probably because one is tucking into a dessert that is not actually available on the menu.

Entry is by a ticketing system and guests can stay at their table for one hour. The simple menu consists of a few savory and sweet options, ranging from Pikachu burgers and spaghetti to Pikachu shaved ice and pancakes. And, of course, there is a shop packed full of merchandise, as well as various vending machines loitering just by the exit in order to gobble up your ¥100 coins.

I arrived on a Tuesday lunchtime, ready for some Poké-fun and food. Attendance at the cafe requires nothing but a relaxed attitude towards paying a price for novelty and a nonchalance towards the exact ingredients of your food. Dressing up is not compulsory; I may take things too seriously.

As a child, I was Poké-obsessed to the point that I may have learned all the words to the first soundtrack and had an imaginary Vulpix that followed me around for several years. So, despite all the new and alien-looking Pokémon (the first 151 were the best – don’t argue), visiting the cafe was quite a nostalgic experience. I was a Pokémon Master once more.

This excitement was probably heightened by a lot of anticipation. A three-hour wait and a ticket number of 99 forced us to lunch elsewhere and return later (we hadn’t brought our Nintendo 3DS’ like the most committed in the queue). On arriving back, we had to join another queue that seemed to have no relationship to the number on our tickets.

Eventually, we were welcomed inside and immediately ushered towards a carefully set up photo backdrop and – to my delight – even more things for dressing up. Just like some of the waiters and waitresses who were donning Pikachu ears and tails, we could also become shockingly yellow.

It was obvious from the rest of the interior that this was a borrowed space – the diner-style tables and chairs were a far cry from the cute and quaint aesthetics portrayed in the brightly colored posters. But they had made an effort with the decoration – Pikachu, sporting in a variety of costumes, were placed around the room, as were logs inexplicably growing Pokéball mushrooms. Who would have thought that you could find magic mushrooms in a place like this?

Our orders had been taken in advance and no further ordering was allowed at the table. My fellow Pokémon trainer took a ginger ale (¥780) that came with an iced mango Pikachu and some electric shock candy, which, when added popped out of his glass and hit him the face. Pikachu 1, Human 0.

I took the Pikachu choux cream (¥1,280) and tried to not think about the variety of colors that lined my plate. It took a shocking half an hour to arrive, which probably contributed to the three-hour queue and the alarming amount of empty tables in the cafe. However, when it did arrive, it came in the world’s largest Pokéball and a Poké-cup pouring out dry ice. Very spectacular, but perhaps one of the strangest gimmicks I’ve come across.

The fun didn’t stop there though. With the cover and dry ice removed, I was given a chocolate pen to decorate my crepe. I wrote a shaky daisuki (I love it!) that delighted the waiter.

As for the Pikachu on my plate, he was a kind of mild mango mousse on top of some underwhelming choux cream, which was vastly improved by the fresh fruit. Let’s not talk about the candyfloss and icing concoction that represented a very sickly Pokéball. The main question is did I enjoy biting a Pokéball in half or chopping off Pikachu’s ear? Oh, you bet I did. Did eating random, sugary, colorful items add to the nostalgic experience? Yes, again!

If there is a sliver of a Pokémon fan within you – if you remember the joy of how age ten you could wander the countryside and capture wild creatures, before using them to beat up other kids – then you should probably get yourself to the cafe before it shuts in February. Don’t worry if there is no-one to go with you – lone diners are welcome and you’ll be allocated a Pikachu companion to sit with you.

And, finally, if you want to do things in style, a custom Pokéball bra can be obtained from SceenShoes on Etsy.

Review: Sony AX100 4K Handycam

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — It was good while it lasted. We had the need for an extra camera to shoot an event last December, so we asked Sony if they would be able to throw us a bone. We got their FDR-AX100 Handycam. While nearing a year on the market, it was still the only thing that could do what it did, with the possible exception of Panasonic’s recently released DMC-LX100.

Since then however, Sony has announced the AX100’s replacement, the FDR-AX33, which, on paper at least, has addressed all the AX100’s flaws and added or improved on a number of key features. Provided that it’s as good a video shooter as its predecessor, I can say, quite simply, that If you want a 4K camcorder, don’t buy the AX100, get the new and improved AX33.

And that would be that, except that I did spend near on two weeks with the AX100, shot a bunch of stuff and had planned to say a few things about it, before the AX33 pulled the rug from under my feet… So here is the gist of it.

The FDR-AX100 was the first consumer (provided those consumers were well off) camcorder that squeezed both a 1-inch Exmor R CMOS sensor (same one as the RX100) and the ability to shoot 4K Ultra HD 3840×2160 video into a compact-ish body. Photons are fed to that sensor via a purpose-built Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T, 12x zoom-capable lens. It features an aperture range of f2.8 through 4.3 across the zoom range and the rather hardcore sounding Bionz X processing engine. Video files are encoded at a respectable 50mb/s, in Sony’s XAVC-S codec, which is a derivative of their professional video codec. It also has some nice pro-looking features like focus peaking, zebras, and the built in ND filter.

The AX100 gives shooters the ability to manually control many aspects of the shooting process such as aperture, exposure, shutter speed, and focus. It was Sony’s flagship Handycam and as such also came in at a whopping flagship price of around ¥200,000 (about $2,000 at release). Being the madly capable camera that it is, however, it appealed to more than just one-percenters who wanted to take holiday photos of their brats. Many professional videographers bought it as a light b-roll shooter. And to cater to them, Sony also makes a professional version of the AX100 called the PXW-X70 which comes with better ergonomics, XLR audio connections, and an ¥80,000 (about $800 at release) price hike.

As one would expect from any Sony consumer electronics product, build quality is solid, and it feels very high end. Physical controls and buttons are generally easy to press and give enough sensation to let you realize that they have been pressed. The hand grip feels good and was comfortable even for extended periods of use. The record button fell under my thumb easily, and the still photo release and zoom rocker were easily operated by my index and middle fingers.

Most of the other buttons are easily accessible and have decent feedback. The only button that is a bit hard to hit, because of its position on the wrong side of the camera, was the focus magnifier, which was quite annoying. Autofocus works, but it’s rather slow compared to ILCs like the Panasonic GH4 and Sony A7S.

The focus/zoom ring works well enough, but it’s not an actual, physical control. It electronically adjusts the focus, and as a result its not easy to accurately hit focus points, though its useful for video where nailing perfect focus is not essential. Focus peaking is very useful in improving your manual focus accuracy, but even then but you won’t want to use it for pinpoint focus pulls.

The electronic viewfinder is extremely bright and useful, especially at longer zoom lengths, and is essential if you are shooting with manual focus, both for the added stability and for the better ability to see focus peak points.

I was very pleasantly surprised to see the AX100 actually sporting a touchscreen, especially when cameras released after it at similar price points did not. Another shock was how easy the interface is to navigate, which is something that Sony is not well known for. But not so with the AX100. Getting through the menus and customizing some of the more esoteric features was, thanks to the touch screen and interface design, a shockingly, un-Sony-like pleasure for me.

Did it work? It’s a Sony! They make some of the best professional cinema and video cameras on this good, green, rapidly warming planet. So, extracting impressive 4K video from the Exmor R CMOS sensor was never going to be an issue.

It does have its limits though, because in perfecting video, the impressive stills quality produced by the very same sensor in the RX100 was lost. It takes better pictures than a smartphone, but with the video-like autofocus and overall quality, it’s never going to be a true hybrid imaging device.

The active steadyshot image stabilization does a good enough job. The HD video image is sharp, the 4K image is sharper thanks to the XAVC-S codec, and colors are decently reproduced (there are also some interesting color profile options which I didn’t use because I’m not a hipster).

There is no S-Log or similarly flat, pro-looking color profile, but it would be wasted on this camera. The footage does suffer from some pronounced rolling shutter, especially when shooting handheld at zoom or moving the camera fast (two things that consumers do with their camcorders).

Once the 4K files were off the card and into a machine, I did have some trouble with editing. The 1080p cut together easily enough, but my MacBook Pro (hardly an editing rig, I know) choked and died a few times while wrangling the 4K footage in Adobe Premiere. Not the camera’s problem at all, but before you go out and buy an expensive 4K camera, make sure you can afford a machine to edit it without issues.

The AX100 struggles in low light, but that’s to be expected from a 1-incher. In a city like Tokyo, however, “low light” is relative, so it didn’t bother me too much. It is a good deal better than just about every other consumer camcorder on the market and it’s not all that bad when the sun goes down. As a consumer camcorder, its automatic set-and-forget mode is good enough for anything you need to do. For users who want to experiment more, focus peaking is a must. It’s hard to gauge how fast the focus shifts in relation to your hands, so something visual is needed to ensure you don’t overshoot.

The other manual controls are easily adjustable by pressing the appropriate button and turning the control wheel to set your desired value. However, you can’t manually set all the values. When you change one, the others default to auto, which was more than a little vexing. At the price, and as it is simply a software restriction, it would be nice to allow full-manual. Who knows, maybe the AX33 does and therefore in a future firmware update, it will come to the AX100 as well.

All this doesn’t really matter, however, because the new AX33 is coming in at half the price with drastically improved image stabilization, double the bit rate, and a smaller package. It promises to do everything the AX100 did well and then some.

The AX100 had a great run. Anyone who bought it got an excellent piece of kit which will take care of their needs for a while yet. Provided you didn’t buy it last month, you shouldn’t feel bad that it’s already been replaced. You also don’t need to go out and buy the AX33 because Sony promises to provide AX100 users the 100mb/s XAVC-S codec in a firmware upgrade soon. If you haven’t bought it and were contemplating it, don’t. Get the AX33, a Handycam developed on the lessons Sony learnt from the AX100 – which means it will be a full generation ahead of its competition.

(Reviewed by Nayalan Moodley)

Kumamon Radio-Controlled Tractor

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — Tamiya Incorporated, a Japanese radio-controlled cars manufacturer, is going to release the electric radio-controlled car R/C Tractor Kumamon Version. It will be sold as a construction kit for ¥16,200 and as finished goods for ¥30,024.

R/C Tractor Kumamon Version has Kumamoto Prefecture-proud Kumamon in the driver’s seat and pictures of tomatoes and a watermelon – specialty products of Kumamoto Prefecture – on its exterior.

It’s a rear-wheel drive car. The front wheels are 97mm in diameter and the rear wheels are 130mm in diameter. By peeling-out, you can make it do wheelies easily!

Size: 345x253x235mm
Weight: 1,670g

See it to believe it!

Review: SJ4000 HD Action Cam

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — The SJCAM SJ4000 action camera comes in a box that has no branding or name printed any of the surfaces. Apart from “SPORTS HD DV water resistant 30m,” there is nothing telling you who made it… which is downright shady.

Pop it out of its box, and you will immediately recognize the design ‘inspiration’ for the camera. It is, for all intents and purposes, a knock-off GoPro, and as such, for the rest of this review it shall be called the FauxPro.

At around US$99.95, it’s a quarter of the price of a GoPro which could, depending on its capabilities, make it a proper bargain. That said, anyone who has ever bought a knock-off in the hope of saving a couple of bucks has ended up being bitten in the wallet when the product performs much worse than the marketing lines would suggest, and then eventually dies a month later.

So with that being said, nobody should be under any illusions that this will be a complete replacement for a proper GoPro, but if it can handle at least half the video quality, and a third of the usability and durability, It would be a worthwhile spend.

It works. I know it sounds obvious, but it’s a valid concern when buying a product that has been deliberately copied. That said, the SJ4000 is in fact the 4th camera made by SJCAM. The first two are actually in an original form factor and performed admirably for their generation and at their price point. But, the form factors are both a bit awkward and not quite as polished as products made by companies with better R&D budgets. As a result, they ditched their designs and went with what works: first, they copied the Sony Action Cam, and then the GoPro.

I’d hazard that the effort spared on designing their own form factor left them with more to put into the specs, which is really the only thing that matters. That said, I really liked their SJ2000 form factor and would have liked to have seen them develop it toward a truly original price competitor rather than a cheap knock-off.

Video quality is good. In sunlight at 1080p, it’s close enough to the big brand action cameras that one hardly notices any difference. Details are crisp, motion is decently smooth thanks to the software image stabilization, and colors are decent. Nothing mind blowing, but more than capable even for some professional uses. (I cut footage from the FauxPro in with my GH3 with only minimal color level tweaks and it looked pretty good). I am not quite otaku enough to be able to quantify it exactly, but I reckon this camera delivers approximately 80% of the GoPro’s video quality at 1080p 30fps, which is great value for the price.

The FauxPro does lack some of its inspiration’s shooting modes and slow motion, but for most action cam needs it’s more than plenty. The two things that the FauxPro does seem to struggle with, compared to pricier options, are dynamic range and exposure adjustment, especially in the evening. While does a good job setting the right exposure for the environment, it often leaves the orange sunsets on pre-dusk bike rides completely blown out. To be fair, while pricer action cams are better at this, no camera with sensors as small as this will ever be able to handle DR all that well, so take it with a drop of soy sauce.

The FauxPro comes boxed with a massive selection of accessories. there is a flat adhesive mount, curved helmet mount, 2 different stems to clip into, 90 degree elbows, a bike handlebar clip, tripod screw adapter, safety lines, and extra 3m adhesive tape and zipties. With the exception of a suction cup mount, you basically have everything you could possibly need to attach it to whatever you want and get on with shooting.

I personally despise how most common mounts for the big-brand action cameras are optional extras, costing far more than they are worth, that force consumers to shell out a lot of extra cash just for flexibility. Yes, the more exotic mounting options should be an extra purchase, but what the FauxPro comes bundled with should be the baseline standard across all brands of action camera. When you lose them (as I have), you can always use actual GoPro mounts or the cheap unbranded versions thereof.

Menus on the LCD are easy to navigate and changing modes and settings is quick and intuitive. It also really helps when framing your shots. There were a few times when, if I did the GoPro’s point-and-pray method, the shots wouldn’t have turned out nearly as well as they did. It’s also good for checking footage that you can’t re-frame on the fly to make sure it turned out right – without needing to download the footage. This allows you to go out and do it again if you want. And hell, it HAS an LCD where the GoPro doesn’t, which is a big plus in my book.

Another thing the FauxPro has that the GoPro doesn’t is a dashcam setting. With this activated, plug the camera into a USB car-charging adapter, and when the car starts up, it will start recording – and it will stop when you turn off the engine. It will also constantly draw power from the USB port, meaning that the only limit to the amount you can shoot is the size of your SD card.

You can also choose to have the date and time superimposed on the footage so when you hit a fixie-riding hipster who claim that its drivers, not their own disregard for the rules of the road that get them run over.

Very decent video quality aside, the FauxPro does show its price in areas such as build quality, the LCD display, audio capture, and what is basically a vestigial still-camera mode.

I’ve read forum comments commending the build given the camera’s price, but having been lucky enough to fondle a great many high-end devices from the big names in Japanese electronics, to me, the FauxPro feels decidedly cheap. The plastic feels like plastic… in a bad way. The soft touch coating began peeling away from the corners within a week. The buttons click well enough, but over time I found that the front power button sometimes doesn’t register unless I really press firmly. There was also a period of time when the camera refused to connect to my computer. It eventually just started working again, but for a period of time it was charge-only, offering none of the usual connection options (of course I tried different cables, switching ports, going through a hub… elementary troubleshooting is elementary).

It is again a great selection of mounts provided along with the camera’s waterproof case, but the plastic does feel quite a bit cheaper than the camera it resembles. There is a lot more creaking and flex from just about everything, and though they do hold the camera firmly in place, they don’t inspire much confidence. On the bright side, the FauxPro can use GoPro mounts, so if they do eventually give out, you can replace them or choose from the massive selection of third party options.

The rear display does its job, but it has terrible color representation, massive pixels, and is just not particularly good in general. In truth, it doesn’t need to be, and it helps keep costs down, and I’m low on bad things to say about the FauxPro, so nitpicking will have to do.

Sound quality is pretty bad. All action cams are essentially crap in this department, but the FauxPro is particularly so. It doesn’t bother me so much because I’d likely be cutting the footage with music or as b-roll with proper sound being recorded elsewhere, but If capturing as-good-as-possible quality sound with your action camera is something you really want to do, the Faux Pro is not the camera to do it.

The FauxPro can shoot still photos, but they are essentially 12 megapixel (4032 x 3024) snaps. The wide angle lens makes for some nice, albeit slightly distorted shots, and the colors are decent, but like the video, dynamic range is quite poor. You can use the 4x digital zoom if you need to get a little closer, and on the tiny rear display the shots look pretty good. View them on a computer however and your eyes will bleed. Really, the FauxPro is not meant to be a still camera so it doesn’t really matter.

The Verdict: While it looks like a GoPro, the SJ4000 is not quite up to par in the specs department, and if you want the creative options that come with higher frame rates then you should save up for a branded original. If, however, you can live with 80% of the video quality at 1080p 30fps, and want a good selection of mounts without having to pay prices that make bottled water look reasonable, honestly, you can’t go wrong with the SJ4000.

It’s a spectacular value for the price, and, because it’s so cheap, you’d be less likely to baby it and more likely to actually put it in harm’s way and end up with more spectacular videos. If it breaks or gets lost, it will hit your wallet a lot less.

The only real problem the SJ4000 has is that it looks so much like the GoPro that many people are going to mistake it for one and you’d need to, “Well actually…” them fairly often. If you’re using it for an action sport that’s more about looking cool and being fashionable than the actual sport (like snowboarding), people may think less of you for it, but you’ll have enough extra cash to hit the slopes a few more times than those who shell out for the real deal.

The fact that it can double as a dashcam, for me, is gravy… just need to get my Nissan Silvia, and its dash, to the big city.

(Reviewed by Nayalan Moodley)

Review: King Jim’s MM-1000 Digital Earplugs

0

Akihabara News (Tokyo) — Back on one of our Untitled Tokyo Two Man Tech Shows, we discussed a product that a Japanese stationery and gadget company, King Jim, had just released. At the time we called them noise cancelling earphones and wondered how they would perform being that King Jim isn’t really a known purveyor of quality audio equipment. We have since spent some time with their MM-1000 Digital Noise-Cancelling Earplugs and can tell you a little more about them.

Firstly, we need to correct ourselves. They are earplugs but they are not earphones. Yes. Earplugs. Their sole purpose is to cut noise, much like those little orange pieces of foam that some airlines give you in the toiletry sets.

Unlike those neon noise negators, however, these are not indiscriminate. They cancel out repetitive low-frequency background noise, but they allow higher frequencies and non repetitive sounds like voices, train announcements, and catcalling construction workers to penetrate.

The plugs are constructed of white plastic and appear for all intents and purposes to be regular old earphone earbuds save for tiny ports on the back. They are attached to a white box which houses the AAA powersource and noise cancelling circuitry. The box also has space for the cable to wind around it and a green silicone cable cinch management nipple thingy. This all fits into a nice, soft, velour-ish carry pouch.

The design is simple and makes the most of the austere materials used, and they feel worth every bit of their ¥4,980 recommended retailing price. There is also a selection of four silicone earbuds that should cater to most of our species. They are as comfortable as any set of standard earbuds and downright luxurious compared to the vile abominations Apple bundles with their devices.

Pop them in your ears, switch them on, and… BAM! Or rather… unBAM! A bustling Shinjuku street becomes a relaxing park. Coffee shops become libraries with lattes. Conversations are clearer because the peripheral buzz is removed. Even the steel tubes of misery and sadness (Tokyo Subway system) become almost bearable.

An appropriate analogy would be driving with a dirty windshield, you can still see where you are going and it doesn’t really bother you that much but stop at the gas station and give it a squeegee and you realize just how much was being obscured. These do that for your ears. By cutting out the white noise, they provide an uncluttered audio image that instantly and exponentially improves your focus and spatial awareness. In use, it almost feels as if your other senses, especially sight and smell, improve drastically just because your brain has to do less work filtering out the background noise.

But there are flaws.

Firstly, higher frequency mechanical noises are not cut out. while you lose the hum of the air conditioner, you gain the wooshing of the air coming through it. The normally drowned out creaks, rattles, and sighs on the train come to the fore. While they do improve one’s ability to focus, they also make distracting sounds that much clearer.

Secondly, they seem silent in noisy environments, but wear them somewhere quiet and you’ll notice they do produce a slight hiss.

Thirdly, all wired earphones amplify the noise of their cables as they rub against clothes, but turn the music up and you can ignore it. With these, however, it’s jarring to a point where it became impossible to really use them while walking or even standing with the box in your pocket. This limits their use to tasks where the user is sitting down and can place the box on a table with nothing touching the cable between the box and the earbuds.

They do what they are supposed to do and they can show you a whole new world of audio-spatial clarity. For their low price, some may consider the flaws a fair tradeoff, especially for desk work in noisy environments. Most importantly, they are an excellent proof of concept. If they make it to wireless, being able to take advantage of the level of clarity and focus they provide while on the move would be stellar.

(Review by Nayalan Moodley)

Kira-Kira Names for Kids

0

Shiny Names for Kids to the Chagrin of Many in Japan

By Stephen Karnas

A new trend for children’s names sweeping Japan is the kira-kira name phenomenon. “Kira-kira” literally means “shiny” or “sparkly” and what is going on is kids are getting shiny new names that look or sound cute or interesting, but are unintelligible to all but the kid’s parents. The Chinese kanji are being used as a phonetic symbol rather than for the meaning of the kanji. And names are being given that sound like characters from animation films or games.

The boom of parents naming their children a kira-kira name started quite a while ago, and at this point, there are relatively many children who have kira-kira names – names that are impossible for other Japanese to read.

The issue exploded recently when an elementary school class student list, loaded with kira-kira names, floated on the net. Nobody knows if the list was real or a hoax but it shed light on the issue and shocked many who were not aware of the phenomenon.

Meanwhile, a children’s doctor tweeted a complaint that due to kira-kira names, it takes too much time to figure out the real name of patients who are arriving at hospitals for emergency treatment. There is not a moment to lose in medical practice, he said, but kira-kira names are causing the risk of patient ID mix-ups by medical teams.

Even Prime Minister Abe has gotten involved, complaining about kira-kira names saying “Many of these kids with kira-kira names get bullied.” He also went on to say that parents should take a more sober approach to naming their kids, because it is “different than naming your pets”…

Here are some examples of kira-kira names:

光宙 – ぴかちゅう – Pikachu (The Chinese characters mean Light/Univers)

愛猫 – きてぃ – Kitty (The Chinese characters mean Lovable/Cat)

今鹿 – なうしか – Naushika (The first Chinese character 今 means “now” which is pronouced as Nau in Japanese)

大熊猫 – ぱんだ – Panda

礼 – ぺこ – Peko (礼 means “bow” in English. Peko describes an action of bowing in Japanese)

凸 – てとりす – Tetris (The Chinese character 凸 looks like a Tetris bloc)

緑輝 – さふぁいあ – Sapphire (The Chinese characters mean Green/Shining)

火星 – まあず – Mars (火星 means Mars. The Chinese characters are never pronounced Mars in Japanese.)

泡姫 – ありえる – Ariel (The Chinese characters mean Bubble/ Princess)

男 – あだむ – Adam (男 means “man” in Japanese)

馬周 – ましゅう – Matthew (Phonetic equivalent of Matthew)

大穴 – だいあな – Diana (Phonetic equivalent of Diana)

Where will the madness end?